The Effectiveness of Arbitration as an Alternative to Business Dispute Resolution: Between Procedural Efficiency and Certainty of Adjudication
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.253Keywords:
Arbitration, Effectiveness, Procedural Efficiency, Certainty of Implementation of Decisions, Business DisputesAbstract
The development of increasingly complex business activities demands a dispute resolution mechanism that is not only able to provide legal certainty, but also ensure the efficiency of the case settlement process. Arbitration is present as an alternative dispute resolution that offers procedural flexibility, confidentiality, and faster resolution than litigation. However, the effectiveness of arbitration is not only determined by procedural efficiency, but also by the certainty of the implementation of the award. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of arbitration as an alternative to business dispute resolution by focusing on the relationship between procedural efficiency and the certainty of award implementation in the Indonesian legal system. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used include primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively through prescriptive analysis methods. The results of the study show that arbitration has advantages in the form of more flexible procedures, relatively fast dispute resolution, process secrecy, and freedom of the parties to choose arbitrators who have competence according to the character of business disputes. Nonetheless, the effectiveness of arbitration has not been fully determined by procedural efficiency as the implementation of awards still depends on the support of judicial institutions, particularly in the process of execution and annulment of arbitral awards. Therefore, the effectiveness of arbitration can only be realized if procedural efficiency goes hand in hand with the certainty of the implementation of the award through the consistent application of the principle of final and binding and the limitation of court intervention in accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations.
Downloads
References
Ariprabowo, T., & Nazriyah, R. (2017). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Pengadilan Dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 15/Puu-Xii/2014. Jurnal Konstitusi, 14(4), 701–727.
Asis, L. F. (2024). Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Berbasis Al-Qur’an. Tarunalaw: Journal Of Law And Syariah, 2(01), 107–118.
Dewi, N. I. W. L., Wibawa, I. G. K. A., & Antara, I. W. (2021). Pengaturan Pengakuan Dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Berdasarkan Konvensi New York 1958 Di Indonesia. Majalah Ilmiah Universitas Tabanan, 18(1), 121–127.
Harahap, P. (2018). Eksekutabilitas Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Lembaga Peradilan/The Executability Of Arbitration Award By Judicial Institutions. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(1), 127–150.
Hombokau, T. C. M. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase Internasional Dalam Sengketa Kapal Marina Bay. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Alethea, 8(1), 53–68.
Latief, A. M. I., Sumardi, J., & Sakharina, I. K. (2023). Kedaulatan Hukum Nasional Dalam Putusan Arbitrase Internasional: Sengketa Negara Versus Pihak Swasta. Amanna Gappa, 57–69.
Mahendar, F., & Budhayati, C. T. (2019). Konsep Take It Or Leave It Dalam Perjanjian Baku Sesuai Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: Alethea, 2(2), 97–114.
Mantili, R. (2021). Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(1), 47–65. Https://Doi.Org/10.23920/Jbmh.V6i1.252
Mustika, D. A., & Ferrary, A. A. I. (2023). Strategi Penyelesaian Sengketa Hki Melalui Arbitrase Dan Mediasi Dalam Hukum Dagang Internasional. Yustisi, 10(1), 332–337.
Primayanti, A. D., & Bruaharja, I. (2023). Amanat Undang-Undang Partai Politik Terhadap Partisipasi Kader Perempuan Dalam Pemilihan Umum. Amsir Law Journal, 4(2), 220–227. Https://Doi.Org/10.36746/Alj.V4i2.208
Pulungan, S., & Nuroni, A. M. (2023). Pelaksanaan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Dan International. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Issn 2721-4796 (Online), 3(2), 2178–2190.
Rafika, R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Asuransi Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Salam: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, Vol.9(No.4), Hlm.1209-1222. Https://Doi.Org/10.15408/Sjsbs.V9i4.26601
Retnaningsih, S., Nasution, D. L. S., Velentina, R. A., & Manthovani, K. (2020). Pelaksanaan E-Court Menurut Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2018 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik Dan E-Litigation Menurut Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Di Peng. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, Vol.50(No.1), Hlm.124-144.
Riza, F., & Abduh, R. (2019). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Arbitrase Melalui Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 77–86.
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif Dan Empiris). Bandung: Penerbit Widina.
Sari, I. (2019). Keunggulan Arbitrase Sebagai Forum Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(2).
Situmorang, M. (2020). Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 20(4), 573.
Syita, K. K. (2014). Penerapan Prinsip Pembuktian Hukum Perdata Formil Dalam Arbitrase Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Yuridika, 29(1).
Tampongangoy, G. H. (2015). Arbitrase Merupakan Upaya Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasioanal. Lex Et Societatis, 3(1).
Wijaya, E. E. (2021). Penerapan Konsep Public Policy Sebagai Alasan Penolakan Pengakuan Dan Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Di Indonesia Dan Singapura. Jurnal Hukum Visio Justisia, 1(1), Hlm. 51-70.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Refli attalariq pane, Raihan ryanta akbar, Ahmad syahbuddin ritonga, Ibnu zarir, Zulfarhan ibrahim harahap

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.










