Corporations Before Arbitral Awards: Between Contractual Autonomy and State Intervention

Authors

  • Ahmad Nizar Mohammad Syamwil Universiti Malaya, Malaysia
  • Nur Hafizah Husna Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Siti Kholizah Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Irpan Mauliandi Damanik Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1306

Keywords:

Arbitration, Corporations, Contractual Autonomy

Abstract

The increasing complexity of corporate business activities has intensified the potential for commercial disputes, thereby necessitating effective, efficient, and legally certain dispute resolution mechanisms. Arbitration has emerged as a preferred alternative for corporations due to its flexibility, confidentiality, and reliance on contractual autonomy. This study examines the legal status of corporations as subjects of law in arbitration, the scope of contractual autonomy in determining arbitral mechanisms, and the limits of state intervention through courts in Indonesia. Employing a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes Law Number 30 of 1999 and relevant legal doctrines through systematic stages of issue identification, legal material collection, normative analysis, and conclusion formulation. The findings indicate that corporations possess full legal capacity to bind themselves to arbitration agreements and are obligated to comply with final and binding arbitral awards. Judicial intervention is strictly limited to procedural aspects of recognition, enforcement, and annulment, thereby preserving arbitral finality while ensuring legal certainty.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adolf, H. (2015). Dasar-Dasar, Teori, Prinsip dan Filosofi Arbitrase. Bandung: Keni Media.

Agustina, R. E. (2024). Efektifitas Arbitrase sebagai Penyelesaian Perselisihan. Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary, 2(1), 263–272.

Andriani, A. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase dalam Kaitannya dengan Prinsip Final and Binding. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(1), 25–36.

Astiti, N. N. A., & Tarantang, J. (2018). Penyelesaian sengketa bisnis melalui lembaga arbitrase. Jurnal Al-Qardh, 3(2), 110–122.

Fitryalita, D. (2019). Kekuatan eksekutorial dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi putusan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia dan hambatan-hambatannya (studi kasus putusan Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Jakarta No. 801/II/ARB-BANI/2016). Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Hamka, Z. (2014). Mediasi-Arbitrase dan Arbitrasi-Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasional. Makassar: Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanudin.

Japar, S. R. (2025, May 22). Anti-Suit Injunction dalam Arbitrase: Penerapan dan Kontroversinya. Hukumku. https://www.hukumku.id/post/anti-suit-injunction#:~:text=antara para pihak.-,3.,mengenai pengakuan putusan arbitrase internasional.

Kharlie, A. T. (n.d.). “Kepastian Hukum Merek ‘Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia’(Bani Kubu Mampang-Bani Kubu Sovereign)(Putusan no. 34/pdt. sus-merek/2017/pn. niaga. jkt. pst)”.

Kurniawan, I. D. (2024). Tantangan Hukum dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa E-commerce: Pendekatan Arbitrase dan Litigasi. AL-MIKRAJ Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-ISSN 2745-4584), 4(02), hlm. 554-566.

Makarim, A. (2019). Penyelesaian sengketa Perbankan Syariah Lewat Mediasi Di Lembaga Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi (Studi Kasus: Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan, Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Jakarta, Dan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Indonesia). Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.

Mantili, R. (2021). Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.23920/jbmh.v6i1.252

Masse, R. A., & Rusli, M. (2017). Arbitrase Syariah Formalisasi Hukum Islam dalam Ranah Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Secara Non Litigasi. Trust Media Publishing.

Ngantung, R. A. (2017). Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. LEX ET SOCIETATIS, 5(1).

Nopiandri, K. (2018). Peran Lembaga Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Internasional: Tinjauan Dari Perspektif Teori Sistem Hukum. Jurnal Legal Reasoning, 1(1), 48–67.

Rafika, R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Asuransi Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. SALAM: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, Vol.9(No.4), hlm.1209-1222. https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i4.26601

Sulat, G. H. (2016). Tata Cara Pemeriksaan Sengketa Arbitrase Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Lex Crimen, 5(7).

Sutrisno, N. (1994). Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia: Analis Permasalahan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 1(1), 42–52.

Suyanto. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris Dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Ahmad Nizar Mohammad Syamwil, Nur Hafizah Husna, Siti Kholizah, Irpan Mauliandi Damanik, & Rahmad Fauzi Hasibuan. (2026). Corporations Before Arbitral Awards: Between Contractual Autonomy and State Intervention. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU , 3(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1306

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.