Investor Protection Through Arbitration: The Urgency of Alternative Mechanism in Resolving Investment Disputes in Indonesia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1312Keywords:
Arbitration, Investment Disputes, Investor ProtectionAbstract
This study examines the strategic role of arbitration as a mechanism for resolving investment disputes in Indonesia. Investment plays a vital role in national economic development, yet it inherently carries the potential for conflicts between investors, business partners, and the government. Conventional litigation often proves lengthy, costly, and insufficiently confidential, prompting a demand for alternative dispute resolution. This research employs normative legal methods (doctrinal research), using statute and conceptual approaches to analyze relevant legislation, including Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution and Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment, as well as arbitral awards and scholarly literature. The study systematically identifies legal issues, collects and classifies legal materials, and applies qualitative analysis through grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. Findings indicate that arbitration provides legal certainty, procedural flexibility, neutrality, and enforceable outcomes, strengthened by Indonesia’s ratification of the 1958 New York Convention. Despite legal and practical challenges, arbitration effectively protects investor rights, supports a conducive investment climate, and enhances Indonesia’s economic competitiveness. Recommendations include strengthening institutions, human resources, and future research aligned with digital and cross-border investments.
Downloads
References
Agustina, R. E. (2024). Efektifitas Arbitrase Sebagai Penyelesaian Perselisihan. Ethics And Law Journal: Business And Notary, 2(1), 263–272.
Asnawi, M. I., Fitriani, R., Tala, W. S., Tarigan, J. A. P., Daffa, T. M., & Habibi, W. (2024). Pelaksanaan Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Melalui Arbitrase Di Negara Berkembang. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, 4(3), 124–140.
Astiti, N. N. A., & Tarantang, J. (2018). Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Melalui Lembaga Arbitrase. Jurnal Al-Qardh, 3(2), 110–122.
Entriani, A. (2017). Arbitrase Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia. None, 3(2), 277–293.
Hakim, M. A. (2022). Efektivitas Pasal 9 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Di Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia. Sakina: Journal Of Family Studies, 6(1).
Harahap, P. (2018). Eksekutabilitas Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Lembaga Peradilan/The Executability Of Arbitration Award By Judicial Institutions. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(1), 127–150.
Harahap, S. K. (2022). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Penolakan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 63–80.
Japar, S. R. (2025, May 22). Anti-Suit Injunction Dalam Arbitrase: Penerapan Dan Kontroversinya. Hukumku. Https://Www.Hukumku.Id/Post/Anti-Suit-Injunction#:~:Text=Antara Para Pihak.-,3.,Mengenai Pengakuan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional.
Juliana, D. T. (N.D.). Perbandingan Penyelesaian Sengketa Syariah Melalui Cara Arbitrase Di Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional (Basyarnas) Dan Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan (Laps Sjk). Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Kharlie, A. T. (N.D.). “Kepastian Hukum Merek ‘Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia’(Bani Kubu Mampang-Bani Kubu Sovereign)(Putusan No. 34/Pdt. Sus-Merek/2017/Pn. Niaga. Jkt. Pst)”.
Kurniawan, I. D. (2024). Tantangan Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce: Pendekatan Arbitrase Dan Litigasi. Al-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-Issn 2745-4584), 4(02), Hlm. 554-566.
Maharani, N. M. I., Dewi, A. A. S. L., & Suryani, L. P. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Para Pihak Yang Telah Terikat Dalam Perjanjian Arbitrase (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Denpasar). Jurnal Analogi Hukum, Vol.2(No.1), Hlm.119-123. Https://Doi.Org/10.22225/Ah.2.1.1615.119-123
Mangei, R. B. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Lex Privatum, 8(3).
Prayuti, Y., Lany, A., Takaryanto, D., Hamdan, A. R., Ciptawan, B., & Nugroho, E. A. (2024). Efektivitas Mediasi Dan Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Kesehatan. Syntax Idea, 6(3), 1533–1544.
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif Dan Empiris). Penerbit Widina.
Triana, N., & Si, S. H. M. (2019). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Dengan Model Mediasi, Arbitrase, Negosiasi Dan Konsiliasi. Kaizen Sarana Edukasi.
Yamin, A. F. (2024). Strategi Efektif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Dan Implikasinya Terhadap Kelangsungan Usaha Di Indonesia: Analisis Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Meraja Journal, 7(1), 36–47.
Zaryanda, P. S. (2023). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Mobil Suatu Perusahaan Di Kota Padang Dalam Perspektif Undang Undang No 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ikhsan Sahriyan, M. Fazli Pratama, Rahman Al Fauzi Siregar, Siti Salmiah Dalimunthe, Usamah Zaki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
