Contract Law and Default in Indonesian E-Commerce Transactions: Legal Certainty, Consumer Protection, and the Future of Digital Contract Enforcement

Authors

  • David Nwanna Dumbiri University of Benin, Benin City. Nigeria
  • Luluk Makhmia Universitas PGRI Wiranegara, Pasuruan, Jawa Timur
  • Putri Wulan Mandasari Universitas PGRI Wiranegara, Pasuruan, Jawa Timur
  • Yoga Dwi Firmansyah Universitas PGRI Wiranegara, Pasuruan, Jawa Timur
  • Firza Agung Prakos Universitas PGRI Wiranegara, Pasuruan, Jawa Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70826/jsisnu.v3i1.1244

Keywords:

Indonesian Legal System, Contrak law, Default, Online Buying And Selling, Business Economics

Abstract

The rapid expansion of electronic commerce has fundamentally transformed contractual relationships by enabling legally binding transactions to be concluded through digital platforms without physical interaction between contracting parties. While this transformation has improved commercial efficiency, it has simultaneously generated increasingly complex legal issues concerning contractual validity, breach of contract, consumer protection, and dispute resolution. In Indonesia, although online agreements are recognized under the Civil Code and electronic transaction regulations, cases of default in e-commerce transactions continue to demonstrate a significant gap between normative legal provisions and practical enforcement. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Indonesian contract law in online purchase transactions, examine the legal consequences of default committed by sellers, and evaluate the effectiveness of existing legal mechanisms in providing legal certainty and consumer protection within the digital economy. The research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches. Legal materials were collected from primary legislation, legal doctrines, judicial opinions, and international legal instruments, and were analyzed through qualitative legal reasoning supported by systematic and comparative legal interpretation. The findings indicate that electronic contracts possess the same binding legal force as conventional agreements provided that the requirements stipulated in Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code are fulfilled. Nevertheless, legal enforcement remains constrained by weak contractual compliance, unequal bargaining positions between consumers and business actors, fragmented dispute resolution mechanisms, and limited integration between conventional contract law and digital commerce regulations. This study proposes an Integrated Digital Contract Enforcement Model that combines civil law principles, electronic transaction regulation, consumer protection mechanisms, and online dispute resolution to strengthen legal certainty and enhance contractual justice within Indonesia's evolving digital economy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asyhadie, Z. (2008). Hukum bisnis. RajaGrafindo Persada.

Badrulzaman, M. D. (1980). Perjanjian baku (standar): Perkembangannya di Indonesia. Alumni.

Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective. Russell Sage Foundation.

Government of Indonesia. (1999). Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Government of Indonesia. (2008). Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Government of Indonesia. (2016). Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning Amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Government of Indonesia. (2019). Government Regulation Number 71 of 2019 concerning the Implementation of Electronic Systems and Transactions. State Gazette of the Republic of Indonesia.

Griswanti, L. (2005). Perlindungan hukum terhadap penerima lisensi dalam perjanjian (Master's thesis, Universitas Gadjah Mada).

Kandori, I. (2025). Aspek hukum dalam ekonomi dan bisnis. Penerbit Tahta Media.

Marzuki, P. M. (2023). Pengantar ilmu hukum. Kencana.

Raharjo, H. (2009). Hukum perjanjian di Indonesia. Pustaka Yustisia.

Subekti, R. (1984). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Intermasa.

Subekti, R. (2003). Hukum perjanjian. Intermasa.

Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (2003). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Pradnya Paramita.

Subekti, S. H., Lestari, V. N. S., & SE, M. (2020). Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen rumah tapak dalam kontrak jual beli berdasarkan perjanjian pengikatan jual beli. Jakad Media Publishing.

Suleman, M. (2024). Tinjauan hukum bagi pelaku wanprestasi pada transaksi online. Lex Crimen, 12(4).

Tutik, D. T., & SH, M. (2015). Hukum perdata dalam sistem hukum nasional. Kencana.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (1996). UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce. United Nations.

United Nations Commission on International Trade Law. (2001). UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Signatures. United Nations.

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. (2024). Digital economy report 2024. United Nations.

Wulandari, Y. S. (2018). Perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen terhadap transaksi jual beli e-commerce. AJUDIKASI: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 199–210.

Yaqin, A. (2019). Akibat hukum wanprestasi dalam jual beli online menurut Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Dinamika, 25(6).

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

David Nwanna Dumbiri, Luluk Makhmia, Putri Wulan Mandasari, Yoga Dwi Firmansyah, & Firza Agung Prakos. (2026). Contract Law and Default in Indonesian E-Commerce Transactions: Legal Certainty, Consumer Protection, and the Future of Digital Contract Enforcement. Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU , 3(1), 118–129. https://doi.org/10.70826/jsisnu.v3i1.1244

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)