Reconstruction of the Theory of Legal Authority in Islam: A Dialectic between Revelation, Reason, and Social Reality

Authors

  • Manswab Mahsen Abdulrahman Departement of Sharia Islamic University in Uganda
  • Abdul Rahman kabag Ops Polres Langkat
  • Muhammad Sopyan Pegawai ASDP
  • Khairuddin Hasibuan Universitas Labuhan Batu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1475

Keywords:

Reason, Law, Contextual, Revelation

Abstract

This study reconstructs the theory of legal authority in Islam by examining the dialectical relationship between revelation, reason, and social reality as the three fundamental epistemological pillars of Islamic legal formation. The study is motivated by the inadequacy of classical hierarchical models of legal authority to fully explain contemporary legal challenges arising from technological advancement, globalization, and increasing social complexity. Accordingly, the research aims to develop a reconstructed theoretical framework that explains how Islamic legal authority is generated through the dynamic interaction of divine revelation, rational interpretation, and empirical social context. This research employs a qualitative library research method using historical, philosophical, and conceptual approaches. Primary sources include the Qur'an, Hadith, classical works of uṣūl al-fiqh, and contemporary scholarship on Islamic legal theory, which are analyzed through critical, comparative, and dialectical methods. The findings demonstrate that revelation remains the supreme source of normative legitimacy, reason functions as the epistemological mechanism for legal interpretation through qiyās, istiḥsān, and maṣlaḥah, while social reality serves as an empirical dimension that continuously shapes contextual legal reasoning through ijtihād. Beyond reaffirming these traditional roles, this study proposes a reconstructed Triadic Dialectical Authority Model, in which legal authority emerges from the continuous interaction among normative legitimacy, rational coherence, and contextual responsiveness rather than from a purely hierarchical relationship. This model offers a theoretical contribution by redefining Islamic legal authority as a dynamic epistemological system capable of preserving the primacy of revelation while remaining adaptive to contemporary legal and societal transformations. The study concludes that the future development of Islamic jurisprudence requires an integrative approach that strengthens collective ijtihād, interdisciplinary engagement, and maqāṣid al-sharī'ah-oriented legal reasoning to ensure both normative authenticity and practical relevance.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abubakar, A. (2022). Otoritas Hukum Sunah Sebagai Wahyu. El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 5(1), 88–101.

Dermawan, H., Syahnan, M., Khair, N., & Tanjung, D. (2025). Epistemologi Ilmu Ushul Fiqh Dan Relevansinya Dalam Penetapan Hukum Syara’. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(6), 11795–11802.

Fahrul, K. M., & Sa’diyah, F. (2024). Penyebaran Hadis Di Yaman Serta Sejarah Dan Perkembangan. Jurnal Media Akademik (Jma), 2(12).

Fathurrahman, H. (2024). Analisis Maslahah Mursalah Imam Malik Dalam Penetapan Harga Yang Adil Pada Pasar Syariah Perspektif Keseimbangan Ekonomi Dan Keadilan Sosial. Journal Of Syntax Literate, 9(12).

Firdaus, S., & Achmad, M. (2024). Studi Epistemologi Hukum Islam Dalam Konteks Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia. Jurnal Pusaka, 14(1), 44.

Gofar, A., Amina, S., & Fajrin, N. (2025). Rekonstruksi Konsep Maslahah Mursalah Sebagai Basis Ijtihad Kontemporer Dalam Menjawab Tantangan Modernitas. Tamaddun, 10(1), Hlm. 9.

Herawati, A., Ningrum, U. D., & Sari, H. P. (2024). Wahyu Sebagai Sumber Utama Kebenaran Dalam Pendidikan Islam: Kajian Kritis Terhadap Implementasinya Di Era Modern. Moral: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Islam, 1(4), 109–126.

Huda, Z. (2025). Posisi Istihsan Dan Maslahah Mursalah Dalam Ijtihad Ekonomi Syariah: Analisis Metodologis Dan Aplikasi Kontemporer. Tashfir Terateks: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Syariah, 1(2), 106–116.

Japri, M., & Abbas, N. (2026). Relasi Akal Dan Wahyu Dalam Pandangan Muktazilah. Mazalat: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 7(1), 52–70.

Makruf, S., Mufti, R. A., Jalaludin, D., Ningsih, L. D., & Sururie, R. W. (2025). Analysis Of Methods Of Discovery Of Islamic Law: A Critical Study Of Qiyas, Al-Maslahah Al-Mursalah, Istihsan, And Al-Urf In A Contemporary Context. Al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies, 8(4), 57–67.

Nasrudin, I., & Iman, M. T. (2026). Relasi Akal Dan Wahyu Dalam Pemikiran Fazlur Rahman: Studi Hermeneutika. Jurnal Inspirasi Pembelajaran, 7(1).

Pane, K., Syahnan, M., & Adly, M. A. (2025). Kontribusi Istihsan Dan Maslahah Mursalah Terhadap Pengembangan Hukum Islam Yang Kontekstual Dan Responsif. Mudabbir Journal Research And Education Studies, 5(2), 4828–4838.

Pertiwi, T. D., & Herianingrum, S. (2024). Menggali Konsep Maqashid Syariah: Perspektif Pemikiran Tokoh Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Islam, 10(1), 807–820.

Ridlo, M. R., & Muhajirin, M. (2022). Gagasan Maqashid Syariah Dan Ekonomi Syariah Dalam Pandangan Imam Ibnu Taimiyah Dan Imam Ibnu Qayyim Al-Jauziyah. Taraadin: Jurnal Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam, 2(2), 65–86.

Ritonga, M., & Arfa, F. A. (2026). Sumber Dan Asas Hukum Islam: Asas-Asas Hukum Islam. Alwaqfu: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Dan Wakaf, 4(01).

Rokade, Y. (2025). Maqashid Al-Syariah Menurut Imam Al-Ghazali: Kajian Filosofis Dan Relevansi Hukum Islam Kontemporer. Jurnal Edukasi Dan Literasi Pendidikan, 6(3).

Rukhmana, T., Darwis, D., Ip, S., Alatas, A. R., Se, M. M., Tarigan, W. J., … S St, M. M. (2022). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Cv Rey Media Grafika.

Sultan, L., & Rahmatiah, H. L. (2026). Rekontruksi Metodologis Pemikiran Filosofis Hukum Islam: Integrasi Multidisipliner Sebagai Fondasi Respons Hukum Islam Terhadap Tantangan Era Kontemporer. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 4(1), 82–90.

Supriatna, A. (2024). Perkembangan Fikih Dalam Era Digital: Kajian Terhadap Metode Ijtihad Dalam Memahami Masalah Kontemporer. As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga, 6(1), 717–734.

Wahyudi, W., & Solehudin, E. (2025). Ijma’sebagai Sumber Hukum: Antara Konsensus Ulama Dan Dinamika Zaman. Equality: Journal Of Islamic Law (Ejil), 3(2), 47–64.

Wildan, D. (2026). Filsafat Hukum Islam Pendekatan Kritis Dan Analitis. Cv. Penerbit Ilmu Literasi Dan Riset (Pilar).

Yogie, A., & Qadraini, S. A. (2025). Qiyas Dalam Ushul Fiqh: Definisi, Signifikansi, Dan Aplikasi Kontemporer. Al-Mashlahah Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial, 13(01), 11–22.

Zaleha, Z., Harahap, E., Ilham, A., Nasution, R., & Ramadhan, F. (2025). Relasi Akal Dan Wahyu Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Islam: Suatu Kajian Filsafat Hukum Islam. Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi, 13(4), 1617–1629.

Zulki, A. (2025). Rekonstruksi Hukum Syariah Di Era Kontemporer: Analisis Maqāṣid Al-Sharī ‘Ah Terhadap Dinamika Sosial Modern. Al-Qanun: Kajian Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 1(1), 1–12.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-30

How to Cite

Manswab Mahsen Abdulrahman, Abdul Rahman, Muhammad Sopyan, & Khairuddin Hasibuan. (2026). Reconstruction of the Theory of Legal Authority in Islam: A Dialectic between Revelation, Reason, and Social Reality. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU , 3(1), 01–10. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1475

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.