The Dualism of the Arrangement of Jarimah Khamar and Maisir: A Comparison of Uqubat and Witnesses between Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the Criminal Code in 2023
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1323Keywords:
Dualism, comparison, uqubat, jinayatAbstract
The dualism of the regulation of jarimah khamar and maisir in Indonesia is a consequence of the recognition of legal pluralism in the national legal system. Qanun Jinayat Aceh as a criminal law based on Islamic sharia coexists with the 2023 Criminal Code as a national criminal law. These fundamental philosophical and normative differences cause differences in the formulation of delik, the type of uqubat, as well as the system of proof and witnesses, which has the potential to give rise to legal uncertainty and differences in legal treatment of legal subjects. This study aims to analyze and compare the arrangement of jarimah khamar and maisir between the Qanun Jinayat Aceh and the 2023 Criminal Code, focusing on the difference in uqubat and witness provisions. This study also aims to examine the normative implications of the regulatory dualism in the context of the national criminal law system. The research method used is normative legal research with legislative, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. Legal materials consist of primary legal materials in the form of related laws and regulations, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of literature, scientific journals, and the doctrine of criminal law and fiqh jinayah. The analysis is carried out qualitatively through systematic and teleological interpretation. The results of the discussion show that Qanun Jinayat Aceh views khamar and maisir as jarimah that threaten the moral and religious order of society, so that uqubat is formulated in the form of ta'zir sanctions that are symbolic and preventive, with a proof system influenced by the principles of fiqh jinayah. The 2023 Criminal Code regulates similar acts within the framework of modern criminal law that focuses on public order and legal certainty, with criminal sanctions of imprisonment and fines as well as a national evidentiary system. This study concludes that the dualism of regulation reflects the challenge of harmonizing national criminal law in a pluralistic legal state, so that legal policies are needed that are able to bridge religious values, legal certainty, and human rights protection proportionately.
Downloads
References
Fajri, N. (2019). Ketiadaan Batas Minimum Khusus ‘Uqubat Restitusi Dalam Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat Dalam Konteks Perkembangan Hukum Pidana. Syiah Kuala Law Journal, 3(2), 312–329.
Firdaus, M. M., & Maerani, I. A. (2020). Studi Perbandingan Alasan Penghapus Pidana Menurut Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (Kuhp) Dan Hukum Pidana Islam Dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Nasional. Jurnal Hukum, 36(2), 73–92.
Gultom, S. M. (2019). Pertanggungjawaban Tindak Pidana Terhadap Produsen Minuman Keras Oplosan. Universitas Kristen Indonesia.
Khairilina, S., & Ali, D. (2015). RUMUSAN DELIK DAN FORMULASI KETENTUAN PIDANA QANUN ACEH NOMOR 12 TAHUN 2003 TENTANG KHAMAR DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 3(3), hlm. 61.
Maulana, F. A., Mulyana, I., Eriyan, M., & Najmudin, D. (2026). ANALISIS YURIDIS PENGATURAN SANKSI JARIMAH KHAMR DALAM QANUN ACEH NOMOR 6 TAHUN 2014. Causa: Jurnal Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 16(3), 151–160.
MUHAMMAD, I. F. (n.d.). Hukuman bagi penjual khamar dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 06 tahun 2014 perspektif sadd al-dzari’ah.
MUHAMMAD TOMI, M. T. (2018). IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN DAERAH NOMOR 2 TAHUN 2013 TENTANG KETERTIBAN UMUM, TERHADAP PELAKU PELANGGARAN PENJUALAN MINUMAN KERAS DI KOTA SUNGAI PENUH. Universitas Batanghari.
Nurdin, R. (2018). Kedudukan qanun jinayat aceh dalam sistem hukum pidana nasional indonesia. Jurnal Miqat, 42(2).
Oslami, A. F. (2022). Penjatuhan Uqubat Pada Jarimah Maisir Menurut Qanun Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat. Maqasidi, 2(1), 31–39.
Perluasan, A. L. (2021). Perluasan Asas Legalitas Dalam Rkuhp Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Journal Presumption of Law, 3(1), 55–79.
pratama Putra, W. (2024). JARIMAH QADZAF (MENUDUH ZINA) DALAM HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA. Jurnal Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 6(2), 138–147.
Rahmawati, Y. P., Khosim, A., & Najmudin, D. (2025). Penerapan Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat Terhadap Pelaku Minum Khamr Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Maqasid: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 14(2), 129–140.
Rajamuddin, A. (2014). Tinjauan Kriminologi Terhadap Timbulnya Kejahatan Yang Diakibatkan Oleh Pengaruh Minuman Keras Di Kota Makassar. Al-Daulah: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Ketatanegaraan, 3(2), 181–192.
Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris). Penerbit Widina.
Siah, K., & Nursiti, N. (2017). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Pembuktian Jarimah Pemerkosaan Dalam Qanun Aceh Nomor 6 Tahun 20014 Tentang Hukum Jinayat. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Bidang Hukum Pidana, 1(1), 63–72.
Sutrsino, A. (2025). Peran Hakim dalam Mewujudkan Due Process of Law Pada Sistem Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. Locus: Jurnal Konsep Ilmu Hukum, Vol.5(No.1), hlm.17-28.
Usman, S. (2012). Tindak Pidana Minuman Khamar dalam Qanun Provinsi Aceh Nomor 12 Tahun 2003. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 1(2), 16–26.
Yusasni, E., & Harahap, M. I. (2023). Pelaksanaan Hukuman Peminum Khamar Dalam Al-qur’an (Analisis Penafsiran Wahbah Az-Zuhaili Dalam Tafsir Al-Munir Terhadap QS Al-Baqarah Ayat 219 dan Relevansi Qanun Aceh No. 6 Thn 2014 Pasal 15 Ayat 1). Kabillah: Journal of Social Community, 8(1), 1–7.
Zurnetti, A. (2024). Penerapan Hukuman Pada Jarimah Menjual Dan Menyimpan Minuman Keras (Khamar) Dalam Perspektif Qanun Jinayat (Studi Di Mahkamah Syariah Lhokseumawe). Delicti: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Kriminologi, 2(2), 47–59.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Romel Tarigan, Mhd Yadi Harahap
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
