Jarimah Qadzaf and Uqubatnya, Comparison Between Qonun No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code

Authors

  • Saifuddin AW Kantor Hukum Saifuddin AW & Rekan
  • Mhd Yadi Harahap Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1317

Keywords:

Qadzaf, Uqubat, Qanun Aceh, CRIMINAL Code

Abstract

The phenomenon of accusations of adultery without real evidence and defamation raises serious problems in the moral, social, and legal order of society. In the perspective of Islamic law, this act is known as jarimah qadzaf, which not only damages the reputation of the individual but also interferes with social integrity and the principle of justice. The application of qadzaf in Indonesia shows that there is a fundamental difference between national law and the sharia qanun that applies in Aceh, thus creating challenges in legal harmonization. This study aims to analyze the concept of jarimah qadzaf and its uqubat, as well as compare its application between Qanun Aceh No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code (KUHP). The research method used is normative research with a comparative law approach, based on the study of legal documents in the form of the Qur'an, Hadith, Qanun, and the Criminal Code, as well as relevant secondary legal literature. The analysis is carried out qualitatively to understand the substantive, philosophical, and procedural aspects of the existing regulations. The results of the study showed that Qanun Aceh placed qadzaf as a hudud crime with the sanction of eighty lashes, focusing on the protection of individual honor and preventive effects. While the Criminal Code places the accusation of adultery as a defamation complaint with imprisonment or fines, it emphasizes procedural certainty rather than moral and spiritual aspects. This difference reflects the different legal philosophies between the sharia approach and national positive law, but both have the goals of protecting the community and enforcing justice. In conclusion, a deep understanding of qadzaf and its comparison with the Criminal Code is important to integrate moral principles, ethics, and legal procedures, as well as ensure fair protection of individuals and social interests.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdi, F. (2014). Keluwesan Hukum Pidana Islam Dalam Jarimah Hudud (Pendekatan Pada Jarimah Hudud Pencurian). Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan, 14(02), 369–392.

Abdurahman, I. (2023). Prinsip Asasi Hukum Qadzaf Dalam Islam dan Kompilasi Hukum Islam. In As-Sakinah : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam (Vol. 1, Issue 1, pp. 25–34). STAI Pelabuhan Ratu. https://doi.org/10.51729/sakinah11129

Agustini, I., Rachman, R., & Haryandra, R. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Korban Kekerasan Seksual: Kajian Kebijakan Hukum Pidana Indonesia Dan Hukum Pidana Islam. Rechtenstudent, 2(3), 342–355. https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v2i3.89

Dermawan, B., & Harisudin, M. N. (2020). Transformasi pemikiran hukum pidana Islam terhadap hukum pidana nasional (Analisis implementatif jarimah hudûd, qishash dan ta’zir). Rechtenstudent, 1(3), 251–263.

Hadi, S. (2022). Ketentuan Sanksi terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Zina dalam KUHP dan Qanun Hukum Jinayat. UIN Ar-Raniry.

Huda, S. (2015). Zina dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam dan Kitab Undang Undang Hukum Pidana. HUNAFA Jurnal Studia Islamika, 12(2), 377–397.

Irfan, M. N. (2013). Unsur Jarîmah Qadhaf dalam Penetapan Status Hukum Anak Luar Kawin. AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 13(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v13i2.935

Magfiroh, R. I., & Zafi, A. A. (2020). Eksistensi Fikih Dalam Penerapan Hukum Zina Di Indonesia. DIKTUM, 102–117.

Nur, N. R., & Sa’i, M. (2025). Qadzaf Dalam Perspektif Fikih Jinayah: Pengertian, Unsur-Unsur Dan Hukuman Bagi Pelaku. Taruna Law: Journal of Law and Syariah, 3(02), 186–196.

pratama Putra, W. (2024). JARIMAH QADZAF (MENUDUH ZINA) DALAM HUKUM PIDANA ISLAM DAN HUKUM POSITIF INDONESIA. Jurnal Al-Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Islam, 6(2), 138–147.

RAHMAWATI, J. S. (2022). PERNIKAHAN WANITA HAMIL KARENA ZINA (KORELASI KETENTUAN KHI DENGAN PENDAPAT IMAM SYAFI’I DAN IMAM ABU HANIFAH). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung.

Riza, K., Lubis, I. H., & Suwalla, N. (2022). Kepastian Hukum Terhadap Putusan Peradilan Adat Aceh dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Pencurian. In Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia (Vol. 2, Issue 1, pp. 39–47). Goodwood Publishing. https://doi.org/10.35912/jihham.v2i1.1580

Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif dan Empiris). Penerbit Widina.

Septia, N. (2024). Kriteria Dan Korelasi Zina Dalam Fikih Jinayah, KUHP Dan Qanun Jinayat Aceh (Studi Analisis Komparatif). Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry.

Sirjon, L. (2023). Kriminalisasi Delik Perzinahan Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2023 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 12(1), 53–67.

Supriani, S., & Saputra, W. (2021). Jarimah Qadzaf (Menuduh Zina) Studi Komparasi Hukum Pidana Islam Dan Hukum Positif Indonesia. JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara Dan Perbandingan Mazhab, 1(1), 1–23.

Syarbaini, A. (2023). Konsep Ta’Zir Menurut Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Jurnal Tahqiqa : Jurnal Ilmiah Pemikiran Hukum Islam, Vol.17(No.2), hlm.37-48. https://doi.org/10.61393/tahqiqa.v17i2.167

Syuhada, S., & Zulkiram, Z. (2021). Ibnu Taimiyyah on Repentance as Eliminating the Punishment for Adultery [Taubat Sebagai Penghapus Had Zina Menurut Ibnu Taimiyyah]. Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum, 10(2), 189–216.

Talebe, T. (2019). Zina dalam perspektif tafsir Al-Qur’an. Musawa: Journal for Gender Studies, 11(1), 1–13.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Saifuddin AW, & Mhd Yadi Harahap. (2026). Jarimah Qadzaf and Uqubatnya, Comparison Between Qonun No. 4 of 2014 concerning Jinayat and the Criminal Code. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU , 3(1), 86–91. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1317

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.