Beyond Procedural Compliance: A Mediation Readiness and Continuity Model for Divorce Disputes in Indonesian Religious Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70826/jsisnu.v3i2.1949Keywords:
divorce mediation, Religious Courts, mediation readiness, procedural justice, family dispute resolutionAbstract
Mandatory court mediation is intended to create a genuine opportunity for settlement before a divorce dispute proceeds to adjudication. Procedural compliance, however, does not necessarily generate meaningful participation. This study examines the implementation barriers affecting divorce mediation at the Medan Religious Court and develops an institutional design responsive to party readiness. It applies an empirical legal approach and qualitative analysis to judge-mediator interviews, the Indonesian mediation framework, and recent scholarship on family dispute resolution. Four patterns emerge. Parties commonly enter mediation after conflict has become protracted and the decision to divorce has hardened; mediation is frequently perceived as a procedural formality; short sessions restrict exploration of underlying conflict; and success is too easily reduced to the binary question of marital reconciliation. The article proposes a Mediation Readiness and Continuity Model linking pre-court screening and legal education, differentiated court-connected mediation based on conflict intensity and readiness, and settlement continuity for post-divorce issues when reconciliation is unrealistic. The model shifts the institutional objective from formal completion of mediation toward meaningful participation, protection of vulnerable parties, partial settlement, and durable family dispute resolution. It provides a practical framework for strengthening mediation without converting the mediator into an adjudicator or making reconciliation compulsory.
Downloads
References
Altobelli, T., McKenna, E., & Suh, I. (2024). Revolutionizing family courts: Catalysts for reform and the transformative role of technology. Family Court Review, 62(2), 321-342. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12783
Anderson, K., & Augugliaro, K. (2025). Understanding systemic factors that lead to high conflict domestic disputes. Family Court Review, 63(1), 155-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12841
Applegate, A. G., Beck, C. J., Adams, J. M., Rossi, F. S., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2021). Preparing mediators to mediate cases reporting high IPV in a randomized controlled trial: The importance of a mediation manual, training, and consultation. Family Court Review, 59(4), 725-740. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12605
Arminsyah, A., Tanjung, I. U., & Syam, S. A. (2026). Resolving authority dualism between National Sharia Arbitration Board and Sharia Courts through maslahah. As-Siyasi: Journal of Constitutional Law, 6(1), 401-416. https://doi.org/10.24042/as-siyasi.v61.31910
Babb, B. A., & Applegate, A. G. (2024). International judicial symposium on family court reform: Final report. Family Court Review, 62(2), 276-289. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12780
Coffee, M. S. (2021). Cross-border issues associated with the use of online dispute resolution for international family law matters. Family Court Review, 59(2), 211-226. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12568
Crampton, A. (2022). 'We make new families:' Findings from a family court mediation study. Family Court Review, 60(3), 391-410. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12663
Crapo, J. S., Turner, J. J., Higginbotham, B. J., & Bradford, K. (2024). The effects of resolution method of child custody and support plans on parental well-being during the divorce process. Family Court Review, 62(3), 474-492. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12809
Dealy, J. A., Russell, B. S., & Robinson, J. L. (2023). Comparing targeted intervention modalities for high conflict co-parents: A quasi-experimental study. Family Court Review, 61(3), 602-618. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12737
Finck, K. R. (2024). Increasing access to justice for families through preventive legal advocacy. Family Court Review, 62(4), 842-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12829
Fikri, F., Bedong, M. A. R., Salim, M., Muthalib, S. A., & Abubakar, A. (2023). Transformation of maqasid shari'ah in divorce mediation in Religious Courts: Revitalization of the Bugis-Mandar customs, Indonesia. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 7(1), 431-454. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v7i1.9141
Firdaus, F., Harahap, T. M., Sasralina, R., Syamsurizal, S., & Zhuliansyah, T. R. (2024). Modernization of Religious Courts: An analysis of the effectiveness of mediation through e-Court in resolving divorce cases in Padang. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 11(2), 251-270. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v11i2.9650
Guyette, E., & Harris, S. M. (2024). The impact of divorce education programs on co-parental conflict: Review of programs with parent follow-up reports. Family Court Review, 62(3), 542-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12797
Heard, G., & Bickerdike, A. (2021). Dispute resolution choices for property settlement in Australia: Client views on the advantages and disadvantages of family dispute resolution and legal pathways. Family Court Review, 59(4), 790-809. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12565
Heard, G., Bickerdike, A., & Opoku, S. (2022). Remote family dispute resolution services for COVID and post-COVID times: Client and practitioner perspectives. Family Court Review, 60(2), 220-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12639
Harker, L., & Ryan, M. (2022). Remote hearings in family courts in England and Wales during COVID-19: Insights and lessons. Family Court Review, 60(2), 207-219. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12638
Karmawan, K. (2020). Mediation in the Religious Courts of Indonesia. AHKAM: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i1.13249
Lucy, W. (2020). Access to justice and the rule of law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 40(2), 377-402. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqaa012
Melamed, J. C. (2021). Establishing ethical standards for online family mediation. Family Court Review, 59(2), 244-249. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12571
Menon, S. (2024). International family justice as collaborative justice. Family Court Review, 62(2), 290-308. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12781
Muhazir, M., Nasution, M. S. A., & Harahap, A. M. (2025). Bureaucratic contestation in the resolution of divorce cases among the Muslim community in Langsa City, Aceh. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Perundang-Undangan, 12(1), 151-173. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v12i1.11056
Munthe, M., & Firmansyah, H. (2022). Analisis penyebab meningkatnya angka perkara cerai gugat tahun 2020-2022 di Pengadilan Agama Medan Kelas IA. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(2), 679-690. https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v4i2.2198
Ni, D. (2024). An evaluation of remote child custody mediation in San Mateo County, California. Family Court Review, 62(2), 359-371. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12782
Nuraeni, E., & Sururi, R. W. (2022). Mediation in household dispute reconciliation: Prospects and challenge. Khazanah Hukum, 4(2), 120-128. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v4i2.19113
O'Hara, K. L., & Cohen, B. R. (2024). A call for early, effective, and scalable parent education programs for high-conflict separated/divorcing parents. Family Court Review, 62(1), 160-175. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12771
Pruett, M. K., Alschech, J., & Feldscher, T. (2021). The Family Resolutions Specialty Court: An evidence-informed court-based innovation. Family Court Review, 59(4), 656-672. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12600
Rabinovich-Einy, O. (2021). The past, present, and future of online dispute resolution. Current Legal Problems, 74(1), 125-148. https://doi.org/10.1093/clp/cuab004
Quek Anderson, D., Chua, E., & Ning, Y. (2022). To negotiate, mediate or litigate? Examining the durability of divorce outcomes in the Singapore family courts. Family Court Review, 60(3), 434-457. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12661
Robbani, B. I., Putra, A. P., & Suprianto, A. (2024). The failure of divorce mediation: The role of attorney in the mediation process of divorce cases in Indonesia. Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum. https://doi.org/10.14421/jtxm1b69
Rossi, F. S., Applegate, A. G., Tomlinson, C., & Holtzworth-Munroe, A. (2024). Intimate partner violence screening for separating or divorcing parents: An introduction to the Mediator's Assessment of Safety Issues and Concerns-Short. Family Court Review, 62(1), 15-30. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12762
Schmitz, A. J., & Wing, L. (2021). Beneficial and ethical ODR for family issues. Family Court Review, 59(2), 250-267. https://doi.org/10.1111/fcre.12572
Sebyar, M. H., Jafar, W. A., Harahap, S. M., Putra, D., & Efendi, R. (2025). Divorce mediation at Panyabungan Religious Court: Transforming the desire for divorce into reconciliation through cultural values in contemporary Islamic jurisprudence. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 19(1), 81-100. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v19i1.12255
Sourdin, T., Li, B., & McNamara, D. M. (2020). Court innovations and access to justice in times of crisis. Health Policy and Technology, 9(4), 447-453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.020
Syafei, E. S., & Djazimah, S. (2021). Mediation in settlement of joint marital property disputes: Study at Tanjung Karang Religious Court, Lampung. Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga dan Hukum Islam, 5(2), 867-891. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.9039
Tanjung, I. U. (2022). Problematika kewenangan penyelesaian sengketa pertanahan berupa sertifikat hak milik atas tanah pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Scenario: Seminar of Social Sciences Engineering and Humaniora, 613-621.
Williams, J., Gill, C., Creutzfeldt, N., & Vivian, N. (2020). Participation as a framework for analysing consumers' experiences of alternative dispute resolution. Journal of Law and Society, 47(2), 271-297. https://doi.org/10.1111/jols.12224
Republic of Indonesia. (1974). Law No. 1 of 1974 on Marriage, as amended by Law No. 16 of 2019.
Republic of Indonesia. (2009). Law No. 48 of 2009 on Judicial Power.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Court.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2022). Supreme Court Regulation No. 3 of 2022 on Electronic Mediation in Court.
Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. (2016). Chief Justice Decree No. 108/KMA/SK/VI/2016 on Mediation Governance in Court.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
