Metadata Management in the Digital Age: A Qualitative Approach to Practices and Challenges in Modern Organizations

Authors

  • Silvia Meiliandari Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Muhammad Irwan Padli Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Hairul Anam Universitas Islam Internasional Malaysia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.843

Keywords:

Metadata, information management, organization, digital data, interoperability

Abstract

In the era of massive digital transformation, organizations across various sectors face
significant challenges in managing increasingly complex and growing volumes of data.
Metadata, as descriptive information about data, plays a central role in ensuring that
data can be found, understood, and reused appropriately. Metadata management not
only assists in managing digital archives but also serves as the foundation for effective
and efficient data governance. This study aims to explore metadata management
practices in five modern organizations from the government, private sector, and non
governmental organizations. Using a qualitative approach with in-depth interviews,
system observations, and documentation studies, this study identifies the extent of
metadata understanding, implementation, and challenges in real-world work
environments. The results indicate that most organizations still face gaps in
standardization, system interoperability, and human resource digital literacy. This study
also suggests the need for a national metadata strategy and ongoing training to
encourage optimal metadata utilization across all organizational levels.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Batubara, A. A. P., & Nasution, M. I. P. (2025). Manajemen Metadata: Solusi Untuk Tantangan Data di Era Informasi. Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 2(12).

Komisi, T. A. A. K. D., & RI, I. (n.d.). ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP BAB TENTANG PUSAT DATA NASIONAL DALAM RANCANGAN UNDANG-UNDANG TENTANG SATU DATA INDONESIA GUNA MENDORONG SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN BERBASIS ELEKTRONIK YANG OPTIMAL. Volume 12, Nomor 1, Juli 2024, 1.

Kusumastuti, A., & Khoiron, A. M. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif. Lembaga Pendidikan Sukarno Pressindo (LPSP).

Nadiroh, A., & Wiraguna, S. A. (2025). Analisis Yuridis Kebocoran Data di Layanan Kesehatan Digital: Studi Kasus Aplikasi Telemedicine di Indonesia. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), Vol.3(No.2), hlm.313-320.

Pramudyo, G. N. (2018). Interoperabilitas skema metadata perangkat lunak repositori institusi perpustakaan perguruan tinggi di Kota Malang (studi kasus pada Perpustakaan Universitas Brawijaya, Perpustakaan Universitas Negeri Malang dan Perpustakaan Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang)[Sarjana, Universitas Brawijaya]. Universitas Brawijaya.

Ratnasari, D. (2018). Membangun Model Informasi Metadata Untuk Mendukung Chain of Custody Bukti Digital. Universitas Islam Indonesia.

Reza, F., Indah, I. K. D., & Ropianto, M. (2022). Perancangan Dan Implementasi Institutional Repository Dengan Metadata Dublin Core. Jurnal KomtekInfo, 125–132.

Savitri, A. (2019). Revolusi industri 4.0: mengubah tantangan menjadi peluang di era disrupsi 4.0. Penerbit Genesis.

Sulianta, F. (2025). ARSIP MEDIA DIGITAL. Feri Sulianta.

Wibowo, M. P. (2019). Perubahan Paradigma Data Penelitian Terbuka: Pentingnya Platform Pengelolaan Data Penelitian (Research Data Management (RDM) di Indonesia. OISAA Journal of Indonesia Emas, 2(1), 1–6.

Zamzami, M. R., Imawan, M. R., & Ghozali, I. (2024). A Comparative Study On Hadoop Ecosystem: Hive And HBase–A Literature Review. JSSTEK-Jurnal Studi Sains Dan Teknik, 2(1), 97–112

Downloads

Published

2025-09-29

How to Cite

Silvia Meiliandari, Muhammad Irwan Padli Nasution, & Hairul Anam. (2025). Metadata Management in the Digital Age: A Qualitative Approach to Practices and Challenges in Modern Organizations. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU , 2(2), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.843

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.