Comparison of Principles in Rental Agreements According to the Civil Code and KHES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v2i2.840Keywords:
Principles, Renting, JusticeAbstract
This study discusses the comparison of legal principles in rental agreements according
to the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES).
The background of this study is the importance of understanding the differences and
similarities between the two legal systems applicable in Indonesia, especially in the
context of a pluralistic society. The research method used is normative research with a
comparative approach, through analysis of legal documents, literature, and related case
studies. The research stages include identifying the main principles in the Civil Code and
KHES, comparing the principles of freedom of contract, consensualism, good faith, and
justice and welfare. The results of the study indicate that the principle of freedom of
contract in the Civil Code is more flexible than the KHES which is limited by sharia
values. The principles of consensualism and good faith are applied differently, with the
KHES adding unique moral and religious dimensions. The conclusion of this study
confirms that the KHES places more emphasis on justice and welfare in every agreement,
while the Civil Code focuses on legal certainty. These findings are relevant to
understanding the application of law in pluralistic societies and enhancing harmony
between the two legal systems.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, J. (2015). Analisis Asas Konsensualisme Di Lembaga Keuangan Syariah. Iqtishadia: Jurnal Kajian Ekonomi Dan Bisnis Islam STAIN Kudus, 8(2), 281–304.
Alaysia, A. N., & Muttaqin, L. (2023). Analisis Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik dan Pertanggungjawaban Para Pihak Terkait Wanprestasi Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Sama Pemborongan Rumah. Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum, 4(3), 478–486.
Hadi, G., Nasution, B., Purba, H. P., & Barus, U. M. (2017). Penerapan Asas Itikad Baik dalam Perjanjian Sewa-menyewa (Studi terhadap Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Oulet di Hermes Building Medan). USU Law Journal, 5(2), 164994.
Harisa, N. (2018). Asas Itikad Baik Dalam Perjanjian Arbitrase Sebagai Metode Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Aktualita, 1(1).
Jonaedi Efendi, S. H. I., Johnny Ibrahim, S. H., & Se, M. M. (2018). Metode penelitian hukum: normatif dan empiris. Prenada Media.
Kahar, A., Nur, A., Hasri, H., & Setiawati, D. (2023). Analisis Hukum Perjanjian Pembiayaan Konsumen/Sewa Beli Antara Pelaku Usaha Kredit Elektronik Dan Forniture Terhadap Konsumen Tidak Masuk Dalam Perjanjian Fidusia. Jurnal Kewarganegaraan, Vol.7(No.1), hlm.1216-1228. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31316/jk.v7i1.5335
Mahendar, F., & Budhayati, C. T. (2019). Konsep Take It or Leave It Dalam Perjanjian Baku Sesuai Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum: ALETHEA, 2(2), 97–114.
Pantow, C. S. (2020). Hubungan Hukum Para Pihak Dalam Perjanjian Kerjasama Dagang Antar Perusahaan Menurut Hukum Perdata. Lex Privatum, 8(2).
Rosyid, M. (2014). Prinsip Keadilan dalam Ijārah Muntahiyah BI Attamlīk (Imbt); Kuh Perdata Vs Fikih Klasik. Islaminomics: Journal of Islamic Economics, Business and Finance, 5(2).
Salainti, A. (2013). Perjanjian Baku Hubungannya Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Bank. Lex Privatum, Vol.1(No.4), hlm.46-56. https://ejournal.unsrat.ac.id/index.php/lexprivatum/article/view/3062
Sukardi, D. H., & Herlambang, D. (2020). Penerapan Perjanjian Kerja Antara Direktur Dan Karyawan Terkait Dengan Asas Kebebasan Berkontrak Berdasarkan Pasal 1320 Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Pranata Hukum, 15(2), 163–171.
Zulfahmi, Z., & Maulana, N. (2022). Batasan Riba, Gharar, dan Maisir (Isu Kontemporer Dalam Hukum Bisnis Syariah). Syarah: Jurnal Hukum Islam & Ekonomi, 11(2), 134–150
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anggi Wirakusuma, Amanda Syafani Al Ikhsan Hasibuan, Adhitya Aldhani Wijaya, Muhammad Yasir Azhar, Muhammad Asdon Munthe
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
