Confidentiality In The Arbitration Process And Its Implications For Legal Transparency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1308Keywords:
Arbitration, Confidentiality, TransparencyAbstract
This paper examines the application of the confidentiality principle in arbitration and its implications for legal transparency. Arbitration, as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism, emphasizes efficiency, procedural flexibility, and the protection of parties’ interests, with confidentiality serving to safeguard sensitive information, trade secrets, and corporate strategies. Using a qualitative descriptive-analytical approach, data were collected through literature studies, including legislation, arbitration rules, awards, and academic sources. The research was conducted systematically in several stages: identification of issues, collection of secondary data, qualitative analysis through thematic coding, and formulation of conclusions and recommendations. The findings indicate that while confidentiality ensures secure dispute resolution and protects business interests, it can hinder transparency, limit public access to legal information, and create uncertainty for third parties. Legal mechanisms, such as judicial oversight and anonymized award publications, alongside digital security measures, are essential to balance confidentiality and transparency. These approaches contribute to the development of consistent, accountable, and modern arbitration practices.
Downloads
References
Andriani, A. (2022). Akibat Hukum Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Kaitannya Dengan Prinsip Final And Binding. Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 4(1), 25–36.
Dewi, N. I. W. L., Wibawa, I. G. K. A., & Antara, I. W. (2021). Pengaturan Pengakuan Dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Berdasarkan Konvensi New York 1958 Di Indonesia. Majalah Ilmiah Universitas Tabanan, 18(1), 121–127.
Diansari, T. (2021). Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Klausula Arbitrase Dalam Upaya Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perjanjian Pilihan Forum. " Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fhui, 1(3), 30.
Hamka, Z. (2014). Mediasi-Arbitrase Dan Arbitrasi-Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dagang Internasional. Makassar: Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanudin.
Harahap, P. (2018). Eksekutabilitas Putusan Arbitrase Oleh Lembaga Peradilan/The Executability Of Arbitration Award By Judicial Institutions. Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 7(1), 127–150.
Harahap, S. K. (2022). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Penolakan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 63–80.
Japar, S. R. (2025, May 22). Anti-Suit Injunction Dalam Arbitrase: Penerapan Dan Kontroversinya. Hukumku. Https://Www.Hukumku.Id/Post/Anti-Suit-Injunction#:~:Text=Antara Para Pihak.-,3.,Mengenai Pengakuan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional.
Makarim, A. (2019). Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah Lewat Mediasi Di Lembaga Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi (Studi Kasus: Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Selatan, Badan Arbitrase Syariah Nasional Jakarta, Dan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Indonesia). Fakultas Syariah Dan Hukum Uin Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Mangei, R. B. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Lex Privatum, 8(3).
Mantili, R. (2021). Konsep Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial Antara Serikat Pekerja Dengan Perusahaan Melalui Combined Process (Med-Arbitrase). Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 6(1), 47–65.
Ngantung, R. A. (2017). Eksekusi Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Lex Et Societatis, 5(1).
Rafika, R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Asuransi Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Salam: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, Vol.9(No.4), Hlm.1209-1222. Https://Doi.Org/10.15408/Sjsbs.V9i4.26601
Setyalaksono, L. F. (2024). Analisis Yuridis Putusan Arbitrase Internasional Sengketa Bisnis Di Indonesia. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung Semarang.
Sugiarto, S. (2019). Online Dispute Resolution (Odr) Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Era Modernisasi. Qawãnïn Journal Of Economic Syaria Law, 3(1), 50–65.
Sutrisno, N. (1994). Pengakuan Dan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Asing Di Indonesia: Analis Permasalahan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 1(1), 42–52.
Suyanto. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris Dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.
Swarna, Arda S. And H. (N.D.). The Conundrum Of Enforceability Of Blockchain Arbitration: Learnings From Kleros. Mapping Adr. Https://Jgu.Edu.In/Mappingadr/The-Conundrum-Of-Enforceability-Of-Blockchain-Arbitration-Learnings-From-Kleros-2/
Triana, N., & Si, S. H. M. (2019). Alternative Dispute Resolution: Penyelesaian Sengketa Alternatif Dengan Model Mediasi, Arbitrase, Negosiasi Dan Konsiliasi. Kaizen Sarana Edukasi.
Zaryanda, P. S. (2023). Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Terhadap Pelaksanaan Perjanjian Sewa Menyewa Mobil Suatu Perusahaan Di Kota Padang Dalam Perspektif Undang Undang No 30 Tahun 1999 Tentang Arbitrase Dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pasundan.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fitria Mukhtar Siregar, M. Abdillah, Suci Hidayati Malau, Raja Muda Pahlevi Siregar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
