Arbitration as an Alternative to Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Legal System Analysis of Legal Effectiveness and Certainty

Authors

  • Sabilah Widyanti Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Desti Nur Fitriah Pasaribu Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Farida Maharani Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Annisa Divanny Nasution Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara
  • Misli Ihsana Darlian Universitas Islam Negeri Sumatera Utara

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.251

Keywords:

Arbitration, Dispute Resolution, Legal Certainty, Alternative Dispute Resolution

Abstract

The increase in the complexity of business relationships requires a dispute resolution mechanism that is able to provide legal certainty quickly, efficiently, and fairly. Dispute resolution through litigation often faces obstacles in the form of lengthy procedures, high costs, and the potential to disrupt the business relationship of the parties. In this context, arbitration is present as an alternative form of dispute resolution that has gained recognition in the Indonesian legal system through Law Number 30 of 1999 concerning Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution. This study aims to analyze the position of arbitration as an alternative solution to dispute resolution, its implementation mechanism, and the legal force of arbitration awards in ensuring legal certainty for the parties. The research uses a normative juridical method with a legislative approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials that are analyzed qualitatively descriptively through deductive reasoning. The results of the study show that arbitration has advantages in the form of flexible procedures, faster dispute resolution, relatively efficient costs, confidentiality of the examination process, and freedom of the parties in choosing arbitrators who have competence in the field of dispute. In addition, final and binding arbitration awards provide legal certainty while ensuring the effectiveness of dispute resolution, although its implementation still faces challenges in the form of low utilization of arbitration and obstacles to the execution of awards in practice. Therefore, arbitration is an effective dispute resolution instrument to support a conducive business climate, increase legal certainty, and realize fast, efficient, and fair dispute resolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Asis, L. F. (2024). Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Berbasis Al-Qur’an. Tarunalaw: Journal Of Law And Syariah, 2(01), 107–118.

Baharuddin, M. Y. A. (2024). Peran Hukum Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Nasional: Hukum Arbitrase. Jurnal Risalah Kenotariatan, 5(2), 310–320.

Diansari, T. (2021). Permasalahan Pelaksanaan Klausula Arbitrase Dalam Upaya Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perjanjian Pilihan Forum. " Dharmasisya” Jurnal Program Magister Hukum Fhui, 1(3), 30.

Hamzana, A. A. (2018). Pelaksanaan Standarisasi Pelayanan Pariwisata Halal Dalam Pengembangan Pariwisata Di Nusa Tenggara Barat. Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi Dan Kajian Hukum, 17(2), 2.

Harahap, S. K. (2022). Penerapan Nilai-Nilai Pancasila Dalam Penolakan Putusan Arbitrase Internasional. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 7(1), 63–80.

Kurniawan, I. D. (2024). Tantangan Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa E-Commerce: Pendekatan Arbitrase Dan Litigasi. Al-Mikraj Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Humaniora (E-Issn 2745-4584), 4(02), Hlm. 554-566.

Latief, A. M. I., Sumardi, J., & Sakharina, I. K. (2023). Kedaulatan Hukum Nasional Dalam Putusan Arbitrase Internasional: Sengketa Negara Versus Pihak Swasta. Amanna Gappa, 57–69.

Mangei, R. B. (2020). Penyelesaian Sengketa Melalui Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Lex Privatum, 8(3).

Menkel-Meadow, C. (2015). Mediation, Arbitration, And Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr). International Encyclopedia Of The Social And Behavioral Sciences, Elsevier Ltd.

Muskibah, M., & Hidayah, L. N. (2021). Penyelesaian Sengketa Konstruksi Melalui Arbitrase Berdasarkan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Pandecta Research Law Journal, 16(1), 14–26.

Pulungan, S., & Nuroni, A. M. (2023). Pelaksanaan Pembatalan Putusan Arbitrase Nasional Dan International. Jurnal Cahaya Mandalika Issn 2721-4796 (Online), 3(2), 2178–2190.

Rafika, R. (2022). Penyelesaian Sengketa Asuransi Melalui Lembaga Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Sektor Jasa Keuangan. Salam: Jurnal Sosial Dan Budaya Syar-I, Vol.9(No.4), Hlm.1209-1222. Https://Doi.Org/10.15408/Sjsbs.V9i4.26601

Riza, F., & Abduh, R. (2019). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Arbitrase Melalui Pemanfaatan Teknologi Informasi. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 4(1), 77–86.

Rizkia, N. D., & Fardiansyah, H. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum (Normatif Dan Empiris). Bandung: Penerbit Widina.

Sari, I. (2019). Keunggulan Arbitrase Sebagai Forum Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Luar Pengadilan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 9(2).

Syafira, A. (2021). Penolakan Pelaksanaan Putusan Arbitrase Dagang Internasional Oleh Suatu Negara Ditinjau Dari Prinsip-Prinsip Dasar Hukum Perdagangan Internasional. Universitas Hasanuddin

Downloads

Published

2024-09-30

How to Cite

Sabilah Widyanti, Desti Nur Fitriah Pasaribu, Farida Maharani Nasution, Annisa Divanny Nasution, & Misli Ihsana Darlian. (2024). Arbitration as an Alternative to Dispute Resolution in the Indonesian Legal System Analysis of Legal Effectiveness and Certainty. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU , 1(2), 164–171. https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v1i2.251

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.