Criminal Acts of Persecution in the Perspective of Islamic Criminal Law and the Criminal Code: A Comparative Analysis of Concepts and Sanctions
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.70826/jcisnu.v3i1.1324Keywords:
Persecution, comparison, concept, Jinayat, CRIMINAL CodeAbstract
The crime of persecution is a crime against the human body that has a direct impact on the protection of human rights, a sense of justice, and social order, so that its regulation is an important issue in criminal law. Differences in the applicable legal system affect how an act is qualified as persecution and how criminal sanctions are imposed on the perpetrator. This paper aims to analyze comparatively the concept of the criminal act of persecution and its sanctions from the perspective of Islamic Criminal Law and the Criminal Code, as well as assess the relevance of the normative values contained in it for the development of national criminal law. This study uses normative legal research methods with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials used include laws and regulations, sources of Islamic law, as well as relevant legal doctrines and literature, which are analyzed qualitatively by prescriptive-analytical methods. The results of the discussion show that the Criminal Code views persecution as a violation of public order and the legal interests of the state with the imposition of criminal sanctions that are repressive and state-centric, so that the role of victims in the criminal process is relatively limited. Islamic Criminal Law views persecution as a jinayah against the human body that emphasizes the principles of balance, proportionality, and protection of the rights of victims through the concepts of qishash and diyat, as well as opening up space for forgiveness and the restoration of social relations. The conclusion of this study confirms that the comparison of the two legal systems shows a significant difference in the criminal paradigm, where the values of substantive justice and restorative orientation in Islamic Criminal Law have important relevance to be used as a normative reference in the reform of national criminal law, especially in the regulation of criminal acts of persecution that are more just and humane.
Downloads
References
Adilang, J. (2021). Kajian Yuridis dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berencana Dilihat dari Pasal 353 Ayat (1) Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana. Lex Privatum, 9(8).
Bunga, D. L., & Isnawati, M. (2022). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana TNI Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Berat. Jurnal Hukum, 5(1).
Darussamin, Z. (2014). Qisas dalam Islam dan Relevansinya dengan masa kini. Asy-Syir’ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari’ah Dan Hukum, 48(1).
Dwi, R. M. (2023). Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Pelaku Penganiayaan Penyandang Dissociative Identity Disorder. UNJA Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), 307–326.
Heratih, H. (2023). Tinjauan Hukum Pidana Islam terhadap Penerapan Efek Jera bagi Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Ringan (Studi Putusan Nomor 156/Pid. B/2020/PN. Pre). Iain Parepare.
Ichwanto, A. M. (2017). Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan dalam Hukum Pidana Islam. Al-Qanun: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Pembaharuan Hukum Islam, 20(1), 181–206.
JANIN, I. B. U. H. Y. M. K., & ALFIYAN, M. (n.d.). STUDI KOMPARASI PENDAPAT IMAM SYAFI’I DAN IMAM MALIK TENTANG HUKUMAN PENGANIAYAAN KEPADA.
Maghfiroh, R. (2019). Kekerasan seksual (pemerkosaan) dalam rumah tangga sebagai alasan pengajuan perceraian dalam tinjauan hukum Islam dan hukum positif. Al-Mazaahib: Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum, 7(2), 239–249.
Ndapabehar, E. U., & Rahaditya, R. (2023). Penentuan Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Bagi Terdakwa Yang Memiliki Gangguan Jiwa Skizofrenia Paranoid Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. UNES Law Review, 5(4), 3141–3153.
Parasdika, A., Najemi, A., & Wahyudhi, D. (2022). Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Terhadap Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan. PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law, 3(1), 69–84.
Pranata, I. K. D. E. A., Budiartha, I. N. P., & Widyantara, I. M. M. (2022). Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Anak oleh Orang Tua Ditinjau dari Aspek Perlindungan Anak. Jurnal Preferensi Hukum, 3(2), 260–265.
Puspita, A. A., Hadi, S., & Is, M. S. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Korban Noodweer Pada Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam (Analisis Putusan Nomor: 436/Pid. B/2024/PN. Llg). Harmonization: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ilmu Hukum, Dan Ilmu Ekonomi, 3(2), 56–67.
Putri, B. W. Y., & Adhari, A. (2024). Analisis Pemenuhan Unsur Kesengajaan (Opzet) dalam Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Putusan Nomor 1/Pid. Sus-Anak/2020/PN KPN). UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10190–10203.
Robensyah, A., Aripin, R., Putri, R. T., Susmita, S., & Wardani, K. K. (2026). Analisis Pasal 51 tentang Tujuan Pemidanaan Dalam KUHP Nasional Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 9(2), 14–30.
Sari, L. F. (2020). Sanksi Hukum Pelaku Jarimah Penganiayaan Berencana (Analisis Hukum Pidana Islam dan Hukum Pidana Positif). Al-Qanun: Jurnal Kajian Sosial Dan Hukum Islam, 1(4), 369–388.
Shidiq, A., Samuji, S., & Haniyah, H. (2025). TINJAUAN YURIDIS PERBUATAN MENGHILANGKAN NYAWA ORANG LAIN: ANALISIS UNSUR KESENGAJAAN DAN KEALPAAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 454/Pid. B/2024/PN. Sby). JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT, 13(3), 801–807.
Sukardi, D. (2015). Kajian kekerasan rumah tangga dalam perspektif hukum islam dan hukum positif. Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 9(1).
Sururiyah, L. (2017). Tinjauan Kriminologi terhadap Suami Pelaku Penganiayaan dalam Rumah Tangga. De Lega Lata: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(2), 328–350.
Suyanto. (2023). Metode Penelitian Hukum Pengantar Penelitian Normatif, Empiris Dan Gabungan. Unigres Press.
Tompodung, H. R. R. (2021). Kajian Yuridis Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Mengakibatkan Kematian. Lex Crimen, 10(4).
Zaidun, Z., & Setiyono, J. (2024). Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 6(1), 49–60.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Fery Dianta Ginting, Mhd Yadi Harahap
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
