The Role of Arbitrators in Settling the Jabodebek LRT Project Construction Dispute

Authors

  • Khairun Nizam, M. Ardhan Hakim Lubis, Muhammad Furqan Alrizky, Wahyu Hidayat, Alfarobi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.70826/jsisnu.v1i2.96

Keywords:

Arbitration, Jabodebek LRT Project, Development Disputes, Dispute Resolution, Role of Arbitrators

Abstract

Large-scale infrastructure projects, such as the Jabodebek Light Rail Transit (LRT) development, involve complex contractual relationships that increase the likelihood of disputes among project stakeholders. Delays, contract modifications, technical issues, and financial disagreements frequently arise during project implementation, making efficient dispute resolution essential to ensure project continuity. Arbitration has emerged as a preferred alternative dispute resolution (ADR) mechanism due to its efficiency, confidentiality, and finality. This study aims to examine the role of arbitrators in resolving construction disputes arising from the Jabodebek LRT project and to analyze the advantages and limitations of arbitration in infrastructure development disputes. The research employed a qualitative approach using descriptive analysis. Data were collected through library research by reviewing legislation, legal literature, journal articles, and relevant case studies concerning construction arbitration in Indonesia. The findings indicate that arbitrators play a significant role in providing fair, efficient, and legally binding dispute resolution while maintaining the confidentiality of the parties involved. Arbitration also enables disputing parties to appoint arbitrators with specialized expertise in construction law and engineering, resulting in more informed and practical decisions. However, arbitration presents several challenges, including relatively high costs, the absence of an appeal mechanism due to the final and binding nature of arbitral awards, and the dependence of dispute resolution quality on the competence and integrity of arbitrators. The study concludes that arbitration remains an effective mechanism for resolving construction disputes in large-scale infrastructure projects, provided that competent arbitrators are appointed and the arbitration process is conducted in accordance with applicable legal principles to ensure legal certainty, fairness, and project sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hidayat, F. N. (2021). Tinjauan Yuridis Perjanjian Dalam Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Operasional Brt Trans Semarang. Di Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. Universitas Islam Sultan Agung (Unissula).

Indradewi, A. A., & Sugianto, F. (2024). Peran Dan Manfaat Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Ditinjau Dari Perspektif Pelaku Bisnis. Jurnal Hukum Dan Sosiopolitik, 2(2), 85–95. Https://Doi.Org/10.59581/Jhsp-Widyakarya.V2i2.2798

Jaang, S. (2023). Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan. Jurnal Hukum Dan Hak Asasi Manusia Wara Ciencias, 2(05), 349–357. Https://Doi.Org/10.58812/Jhhws.V2i05.303

Muhammad Yasril Ananta Baharuddin. (2023). Peran Hukum Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Nasional. Jurnal Risalah Notaris, 4(1), 311–320. Https://Doi.Org/Https://Doi.Org/10.29303/Risalahkenotariatan.V5i2.209

Yulianti, F. (2022). Perlindungan Konsumen Untuk Pengguna Jasa Transportasi Kereta Api Ringan (Lrt) Di Kota Palembang (Vol. 9).

Zahra, R. N. (2021). Akuisisi Lahan Untuk Pembangunan Kepentingan Umum (Studi Kasus: Implementasi Pembangunan Depo Kereta Api Ringan (Lrt) Jabodebek Di Jatimulya). Notaris Indonesia, 3(4), 1–8.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-29 — Updated on 2024-12-30

How to Cite

Khairun Nizam, M. Ardhan Hakim Lubis, Muhammad Furqan Alrizky, Wahyu Hidayat, Alfarobi. (2024). The Role of Arbitrators in Settling the Jabodebek LRT Project Construction Dispute. Jurnal Sahabat ISNU SU , 1(3), 249–252. https://doi.org/10.70826/jsisnu.v1i2.96

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.